Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | Web Hosting
  Updated: 2009/02/06
Contents:


[ Full Size ]
^Author's note:

History:
The day I started this project, I had just watched 20 hours of a guy called Ricardo Lopez documenting the last 9 months of his life,  and at the end of the tape he shot himself in the head. I realised how useful it had been, to see the absolute honesty of a man who was going to kill himself, and I realised that if everyone just started showing the world anything noteworthy that they conclude, with absolute honesty, there is likely to be many who can learn from you.

So here lies everything noteworthy that's in my mind.
My observations and theories.
My opinions, creations and ideas.
My advice.

The medium:
I have decided to use text for the moment, I was going to try a "mind map" but a html page with sections turned out to be easier to manage. Please excuse any poor use of the English language, I personally don't know it well as a medium, and I'm sorry that you have to read through it all, but please do not think this removes validity from any of my arguments.

--The author
^Everyone (section)
What goes in this section?
^Majority sucks hypothesis
observations:
e.g:
1
2
explanation:
Do you see where this is going? When the majority is in charge things suck and never evolve. The majority discourage population variations, and hinder evolution.

fix:
Logical consensus should out-rule the majority.
e.g. If 60% of people think "creationism" should be taught in science class, it shouldn't matter, because logical consensus suggests that it is not a scientific principle.
e.g. Any book where the creator doesn't care about offending his audience, where the creator isn't trying to please the majority, pretty much will always be fantastic. For example anything by Chuck Palanuik.

It would be nice if those in charge care about what someone actually says, instead of just how many of them say it.
So when the time comes, don't 'vote' for me to rule the nation, 'agree with me' to rule the nation.[sam quote]

^Three theory
It is a means of explaining/predicting why intelligent creatures (in particular humans) make certain decisions.

It splits someone's "reasons for making a decision/means of making the decision" into three equal sections. For reference, these are named: Glace, Sam and LMOE. Call them whatever you want, it really doesn't matter, the author is open to new names.
Think of them as basically "play, rest and work" or "inputs, processes and outputs".

Author's note: I use this hypothesis so many times to explain things elsewhere in this text it's not funny, not to mention how much I use it in real life.

^Glace
Who is "Glace"? Mostly active with which brainwaves?
 Usually prominent in
the perceiving you
 alpha (8-12 Hz) Anything where you are perceiving new experiences.
  • play
    • watching something new
      • e.g.
      • via TV and (sometimes) books
      • watching a game
      • listening to music
      • watching things in real life when you don't have to actually do anything
    • doing things "just to see what happens"
    • being in the emotional state of "wonder" or "curiosity"
What does "Glace" want?
Causes/Effects of repressing "Glace"
Glace is often considered "mischievous" and in "modern western culture" it is the MOST REPRESSED out the three.
Repressing Glace can be done by someone not allowing themselves to "mess around" or do things without a "valid" reason. It can lead to the subject letting Glace "burst out" later in life, in extreme ways like:
Glace has no conscious, no guilt, no concern for others, in a society with consequences for such actions, repressing Glace and forcing him to "burst out" later in life could get the subject into serious trouble.

The author personally takes his glace very seriously and never "fights against it".

The rule that Glace enforces:
R:HPHN (rule: half positive half negative) To be mentally balanced, half your experiences should be 'negative' per se, and half should be 'positive' per se.
Assuming you want to live the "fullest" life, with perspective and wisdom, you should experience the greatest range that you can.
Meaning you must experience things that give you negative emotions, as well as things that give you positive emotions, to get the greatest range.
i.e. "love" and "hate", should be equally embraced.
"love trumps hate" is such an unrealistic philosophy, the author believes that it's actually causing more harm to humanity.
Repressing one of these in your life will lead to a mentally unbalanced person.
And that is exactly what censorship of any kind does.
R:CID (rule: censorship is detrimental) non-optional censorship is detrimental to perspective, wisdom, and your mental balance, which are subsets of your freedom.
If there was a button on the wall, that said: "THIS BUTTON WILL KILL ANYONE WHO IS FULLY INFORMED AND IS STILL PRO NON-OPTIONAL CENSORSHIP OF THE GENERAL POPULATION." I would press the button without hesitation, because they are trying to violate my freedom.
If you want to censor your life
go ahead
If you want to censor my life
I will fight you to the death to prevent it
at least the dead can't be censored
Censorship is arbitrary, things "slip through", and what is "inappropriate" is subject to one's own opinion.
So why is my opinion less valid than yours? Why should you get to choose what I experience in my lifetime?

To me people who are pro censorship are just called "one of them" because typically:
With age: Children have not been around long enough to keep HPHN easily, an analogy is if you picture the mental balance like a pair of scales like this:scales.jpeg with an adult, each side will be full of heaps of keys, so heavy that if the adult saw something not HPHV, meaning it added an extra key to one side of the scales only, it would hardly affect the overall balance of the scales.
But if you picture a child's scales, with hardly any keys on each side, adding just one more to one side only, may cause the whole thing to tip over.
e.g. a movie like Home Alone where the physics are whack, and everyone is cheerful all the time even though lives are in high danger, is not HPHN and will give a child a bias sense of reality, and an unbalanced mind.
Another e.g. A movie like Braindead is not HPHV because of the excessive violence and unrealistic character reactions, and could also give a child a bias sense of reality, and an unbalanced mind.
Suggestion: You can either prolong the experience until the child is older and has more keys (note: that is not censorship), or you can make sure the child has another experience, bias in the other direction, e.g. a really happy movie next to a really depressing movie. So back to the scales analogy, you can imagine a key going into each side as close to at-the-same-time as possible.
Repressing one of these, will just increase its desire to escape.
analogy: Two hoses running water, representing good and bad emotions.
If you block the end of a hose (repress the emotion) what happens? The pressure increases because the water has nowhere to run.
And if you completely block the end for long enough, and the water keeps pumping in, but not out, eventually the whole damn thing is going to blow up.
I'll let your mind fill in the blanks in the ways you can "blow up" in real life.


^Sam
(interchangeable with the readers given name)
Who is "Sam"? Mostly active with which brainwaves?
 Usually prominent in
the thinking you  delta and theta (<8 Hz) Anything where you lose your perception of time, due to your mind being "elsewhere".
  • rest
    • sleep
    • daydreaming
    • organising experiences into memories
    • meditation
    • hypnotic repetitive tasks e.g.
      • being in the shower
      • driving on a straight freeway/highway
      • combing your hair
What does "Sam" want?
Causes/Effects of repressing "Sam"
Repressing Sam can be done by someone not sleeping enough, or not getting "a chance to think", or a chance to "figure things out", often these people have to go to work to often. This can cause:
Releasing Sam is generally easy and not usually harmful at any time in life. You just need time to reduce brainwave frequency maybe through:
The rule that Sam enforces:
R:OC (rule: own choices) The only thing you can actually own are the choices you make.
Information cannot be owned.
e.g. you can't be upset when someone steals your copyright software for free, because it was just information, and cannot really be owned by you.
All "manipulable physical bodies" cannot be owned.
You can use things, but you cannot actually own anything.
Because ownership means you 100% control something.
Meaning no one else can control any of it.
And such things do not exist in real life.
You do not even own your physical body.
It can be one's most manipulable thing in the world, but it still cannot be owned, because your not the only one who can control what happens to your body.
e.g. If your parents don't feed you as a child and you starve and die, you are not in full control of what happens to your body.
Or if your house gets struck by lightning while you are sleeping and you get killed, you are not in full control of what happens to your body.
More minor examples; if you are a fair football player, but a poor referee penalises you for something you didn't do, you are not in full control of what happens to you.
If you know this you will never feel cheated when something out your control negatively affects your body.
e.g. You will not cry in self pity if you or your family get hit by a truck, if you understand they were never in full control anyway.
You will also never feel genuine pride in physical appearance, it's only a means of improving your mating call.
From my experience, body builders tend to be more intelligent[11] than people who do other types of physical activity (or sports), because they admit they are not "healthy" and they admit they are just doing it to look good.
Emotions guide you in making these choices.
Anyone who makes choices they do not regret, will not suffer.
e.g. Someone who's censors the Internet may think they are doing what is "right" and will not feel any guilt and not suffer for it.
same e.g. except to the extreme: If Adolf Hitler really thinks the world is better off with all the people he killed dead, if he really thinks all Jews deserve to die, he will have piece of mind, and will not feel any guilt and not suffer for it.
e.g. on the other side: If you have an abortion and not have a child, then you later come to regret that decision a lot, you may suffer very much for making that decision.
"Maybe you don't go to hell for the things you do. Maybe you go to hell for the things you don't do.”[16]
Meaning, NOT acting out on your emotions, and NOT making the decisions you feel are right, are going to cause you to suffer for it psychologically (a figurative "hell").
with the previous e.g. about abortion: It's not what you did (the abortion) that will put you in a state in psychological hell, it's what you didn't do (not having a child) that put you in the state.
reinforcement e.g. A murderer doesn't feel bad about killing someone, but they may feel bad about not letting them live any more.
In all examples of someone in a figurative "hell", it's because of what they DON'T do.
mainstream e.g. One may be in "hell" because they feel guilty about walking down the street and not saving the girl who was being gang raped in an alley, because they were too afraid that the men raping her would beat them up.
mainstream e.g. One may be in "hell" because they didn't ask a girl they really like on a date and now she's married to someone else.

^LMOE
(short for "Last Man On Earth")
Who is "LMOE"? Mostly active with which brainwaves?
 Usually prominent in
the influencing you  beta (>12 Hz) Anything where you are changing the world.
  • work
    • talking to someone
      • especially something like giving a speech to many people
      • especially teaching someone
        • lecturing them about what's "right and wrong"
      • giving advice
    • expressing yourself
      • writing up documents for the Internet
      • creating some artwork that will be viewed by others
    • attracting a mate, and (sometimes) having sex
What does "LMOE" want?
  • to preserve your key-values and put as many of them in the world as possible
    • this includes basic "survival" and the avoidance of self harm, however it also means affecting others to make their key-values more like yours, in essence letting part of you "live on" through them in the values you share
      • LMOE wants you to keep a physical body while you need it to interact with others
        • eat well
        • avoid pain
        • etc.
      • LMOE wants you to pass your key-values onto others
        • including passing on your genes to the next generation
      • LMOE wants to eliminate anyone who hinders your values from spreading
        • like throwing a criminal in jail for threatening the safety of your offspring
Causes/Effects of repressing "LMOE"
Repressing LMOE can be done by someone not influencing others. Never giving a POV[10] is one way, or "sitting back in life and just watching" is another (the author has done this). It can lead to:
LMOE can be released safely at any time in life, unless of course new information makes you regret your influence. e.g. a catholic preacher realises later on in life that his religion does more bad than good, and heavily regrets letting out his LMOE through his teachings.

Therefore, denying LMOE until you are absolutely sure your influence will not go against your later key-values, can be good for you. As long as you don't wait too long and die before you get the chance to make your influence.

Ways to release LMOE include:
  • sexual intercourse
    • reproducing
    • having someone love you, or romantically loving someone else (by the definition in the link) 
      • intimate sexual intercourse
  • teaching others
  • creating something that will be observed by others
    • for example on a personal note, this text is the author's own "bottled up" LMOE release

^AA Hypothesis
Short For Associative Array Hypothesis, it is a means of explaining the "key-values" that were mentioned in the LMOE section. Although this section is relevant to Glace and Sam too, I tried to omit mentioning key-values in those sections, to avoid confusion of readers who have not read this section.

The name is based on an associative array in computer science, which has a "key" and a "value". A creature also it's own "values" allocated by Sam, for everything Glace has experienced (the "key"). The combination is then called a "key-value" and the key-values are then preserved by LMOE.

You can never "change" a key-value.
This might be why the saying "people don't change" often seems to be true. But while you can never change a key-value, you can still change your behaviour, it's just more difficult.
You see, you can create new key-values.
But it's not so much creating them, as it is branching off already existing ones.
These main ones have been around since you were born, and any new ones that you form are just branched off.
Let's illustrate this point with an example, a heroin junkie, has a key saying "doing heroin" and that key has a value saying "is totally awesome".
This will never change. No matter what you do. Rehab, or whatever, you can never change key-values.
However, this particular junkie, branched off the other key, with one saying "after effects of heroin" and the value is "totally suck".
Then after another six months, he gets another key, saying "effects of my drug habit on my family" and the value for that is "totally sucks more than anything else".
So now, this junkie has quit his drug habit, he has changed his behaviour, but has not changed his key-values, he did this by branching out new key-values that oppose and outweigh the old ones.
The key-value that likes heroin is still there, and will always be there, no matter what, but the one about his family was stronger.
I'm sure if his whole family died, he would go back to heroin without hesitation.
"Morality" is the key-values of the majority.
The author would like to add personal advice: Do not worry if your morals differ from that of the majority, your whole life you have been told to follow the majorities key-values, so it may feel weird embracing your own for the first time.
Key-rate, is another new term, for the speed at which someone has the potential to branch new key-values
It always gets taken into account when weighing up how much you want to help or harm somebody, because the higher the key-rate, the less you want to harm them.
e.g. Who do you want to kill more:
A. Someone who disagrees with you, because they will not even consider what you have to say.
Or B. Someone who disagrees with you, because they have thought about your argument, but then took into consideration something else that you didn't think of yet.
Option A. seems a lot more kill-able to the author.
Children have a super high key-rate, because all the time they are getting new keys from a very active Glace in the new exciting world.
And this super high key-rate is the main reason people always want to help the children.
The author believes, (and this is up for some debate), that women generally have a higher key-rate than men, due to the capability for extra emotions.
And this is why so many men go by the "protect the women first" philosophy.
In generations
The next generation will find it easy to take in all your key-values, and, they pretty much always will add on more. These extra ones can lead to a difference in behaviour and philosophy.
e.g. A kid who is a born and raised Christian, understands all the key-values of Christianity, but eventually strays away from it because he found new key-values that the older generation haven't considered, pointing him in the other direction.



The rule that LMOE enforces:
R:POV (rule: pass on values) Pass on your key-values.
By expressing them.
It is a humorous coincidence that POV standing for "point of view" expression, is the same acronym as POV standing for "pass on values", because POV expression is a good way to follow R:POV.
Chuck Palanuik once said: "The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will." And if you manage to create something that gets a huge amount of views, it can be far more effectual than trying to pass on key-values to an individual.
By reproducing.
This is the quickest and easiest way to get a creature with about %50 of your key-values already there.
By helping others.
Just by being of the same species, LMOE can see many key-values are-already/could-have-been shared, LMOE can see that when someone similar to you dies, part of your key-values have died too. This is why some people care about other people.
So by helping these people out, you can increase the portion of your key-values in the world.
By harming others.
Harming people who oppose your key-values is another method of increasing the portion of your key-values in the world.
Using the author as an example:
The author would like to triple the amount of his key-values in the world.
Achieving 1 of these things will enable this:
  • Create 4 offspring that the author will never influence once after they are born.
  • Create 2 offspring that the author will influence all the time until they know everything the author knows.
  • Have at least 1000 creatures read this entire text, and have them on average, take in at least .2% of my key-values each.
  • Develop a video game that at least 1 000 000 creatures will play, and have them on average, take in at least .0002% of my key-values each.
It may not sound like much, but just getting someone to share .0002% of my key-values is quite difficult.

Now can you see the link to inputs, processes and outputs? Glace is the inputs (the experiences or the senses), Sam is the processes (the choices), and LMOE is the outputs (the influence you have on the world).

There is a very suspicious amount of things that break up into 3's, it really is "the magic number", enough to drive the author insane (he probably is technically that way already).
There is a need to mention the primary colours, blue = Glace, green = Sam, and red = LMOE, because they are just the colours that spring to mind when the author thinks of each one, it's just coincidence that these are the primary colour.
You may notice text that the author hopes you will read with your Glace are in blue, e.g. (examples like this), organisational things are generally in green, and text from the author's LMOE are in red.

^With age
As you age, pretty much this happens:
age_graph.gif

You become less Glace, and more LMOE, but if you added the presence of all three you would always get a roughly straight line with age, meaning each one will be active for about a third of your life.

supporting observations:

^What is all this "bullshit" about brainwaves?
The author is no behavioural neuroscientist, so the author cannot claim the links between brainwaves and types of motivation are 100% proven, however they do seem to fit nicely together.
e.g.
 This was enough for the author to claim that a link seems very likely, and must be included and emphasised.

^Case Studies
Let's look at some behaviours and explain them in terms of the hypothesis.

There are three types of motivation for killing:
Coitus
You may have noticed, that the cure for a repressed Glace, Sam or LMOE is coitus. Which goes by my saying that "the hard part isn't finding the cure to your mental condition, it's finding out why coitus is the cure to your mental condition." [sam quote]
A quick explanation of each one:
They cover the three main reasons for having sex.

^Oppression of information leads to revolution
observations:
e.g:
But let's let all this slide for a second, because it is just a sacrifice for protection against paedophiles right? The last "straw" that turned the author pro-revolution:
explanation:
This fact alone means we do not have true freedom, our lives are being filtered. This is a form of information oppression. Censorship in Australia is getting tighter and tighter, until something is going to snap.
fix:
When a municipality is in oppression, well, see the title.
Google is useless for trying to find a country without censorship, but if the author can find one, the author is likely to move there.
until then, keep clicking this link

^Crazy people
observations:
most people think pointing out someone's mental symptoms, is enough to explain the cause of someone's behaviour
e.g:
"he did it because he was crazy"
explanation:
"Crazy" is just the category of how to class his behaviour, but it in no way explains why he actually did the crazy thing. It is the behaviour that made you call him crazy, not the motivation behind the behaviour, so it really doesn't explain anything useful.
fix:
Hopefully pointing this out will make you look deeper for an actual reason behind the motivation, when documenting an "amoral" action.

^To be or not to be?
(In the sense of: should I kill myself)

Normal people are going to give you a whole bunch flawed answers to anyone who dares to ask this question. They are flawed because it seems there is always a balancing 'pro' every time somebody lists a 'con'.
E.g. here is a list of common reasons normal people recommending not to do it (cons), with the appropriate rebuttals.

Don't kill yourself. (cons)
Kill yourself. (pros)

You can never be happy dead.
You can never be sad dead.

You won't get to go to 'heaven'.
You won't have to put up with all the annoying Christians in heaven.

You can never love again.
You can never get your heart broken again.

It won't solve anything.
Nothing will need solving.

It will hurt the ones you love.
It will hurt the ones you hate.

etc.

But here is the one unbalanced factor, the reason why most humans choose "to be":

If you suicide, you can never take it back, if you don't suicide, you can always take it back and just kill yourself later.

^What is the meaning of life?
(Goal of article: Expose the question as non-useful.)
 
Obviously: to live.
To expand the definition slightly would be 'to perceive and interact with the universe'.
Still I've never understood how someone can think it's actually a well defined question. Your whole memory of existence, as well as what you are perceiving right now, is an as-you-go definition of the word "life".

^Me (section)
The “Me” section has been temporarily omited, because the views and opinions expressed in this section, may be considered obscene, illegal and taboo in the author's current municipality.

Aww fuck it, since when did I start respecting those plutocratic dicks and breaking R:CID. It will remain uncensored, and complete, for your enjoyment ;).

What goes in this section?

^Creations
^Sam strategy (term)
"Sam strategy" is a term I invented for:
Being renowned for doing something without reason, so no one will know when you do it with a reason.
^Love poem (poem)
I'm going to tell you all a bit about an intimate friend of mine, because I just need someone to know how much she means to me.

You could just die from her, I swear.

She's not like any person in the world.

Ever since I was little, she's been there, part of life, and every day I get older I spend more and more time thinking about her.

Friends and family don't seem to like her, but like it or not she'll always be with me.

She's always been so mysterious, so unlike anything else in the world, so fascinating to me.

She's not like any person in the world.

She's always in my thoughts and dreams, I think the whole world would be unbalanced if she was gone.

She's always in touch with reality, always constant in this changing modern world.

She is the basis for every decision I make in my life.

Always with me.

She keeps me motivated, motivated to stay healthy and look after myself.

It's like she's always been there since life on this earth.

And she has a way of snapping you back to reality.

Long lost friends separated at birth.

Many things I see in everyday life remind me of her, ways she can get to me.

She's not any person in the world.

I guess I'm not special to her, she treats everyone else the same way as me.

She's not like a person.

And she always snaps you back to reality.

She motivates all the creatures on this earth.

She motivates you too.

I'm sure she's somewhere in your thoughts right now.

Especially if your old.

Or sick.

She is the reason you want to be healthy.

To avoid her.

You could just die from her.

Literally.

Because she is Death.

Read it again and maybe it will make more sense.

^"Beefs" and ideas

^Theory as to why God would write the bible
Psychological profiling is often a valuable tool for detectives to catch serial killers.
However serial killers may know this, and may send in a letter to the detectives, with detailed information to prove they are the serial killer, and with a lot of other random bullshit about why he are doing this, to cause confusion, conflicting arguments, and squabbling amongst the detectives. This throws the detectives off the serial killers tail, and causes the detectives trying to catch the serial killer do some funny/interesting counter productive things.

Replace the words serial killers with God, detectives with people, and letter with bible, and read the paragraph again.
If he did write the bible, that would be why.

^Australians vs Americans
Many Australians have a problem with Americans because most of them:
 But:
make everyone outside the US unnecessarily ostracised.
E.g. In almost any text written in America, you could literally replace the term  "America", with the term "Western World", to make the subject applicable to about 4 times more of the human population.[15]		 no argument.
don't even know where Australia is, they don't know about anything geographically outside the US.
 that's because they don't need to, I can't name anything "offhand" that Australia does for the USA. Australians are the ones who copy them, so they don't even need to acknowledge that Australia exists. It's not like they watch all of Australia's crappy TV drama shows like "Neighbours", yet Australia watch all of the crappy US drama shows.
have annoying accents.
 so do a lot of Australians, I would guess that there is a higher percentage of Americans than Australians that have an annoying accent though, so no argument.
say racist things.
 that is because they have this obscure thing called "free speech", which is not actually in the Australian constitution. I would rather be a racist with free speech then be a polite government controlled bot.
don't listen to the UN, they play by their own rules.
 what are you going to do about it? Go to war with America? Australians need them on good terms because on how much power they have, and how much they actually do for the world research and development wise.
shoot each other all the time.
 if you hate Americans, than why is that a bad thing?
have their own variation of English called "American English".
  • 2/3 of the English speaking population live in the USA[12], so I suppose that makes those of us speaking other forms of English the abnormal ones.
  • The drop of the 'u' in words like colour, is more efficient, and actually makes sense.
  • Australia doesn't even use British English, we use "Australian English", another queer variation. Making Australian English even worse than American English, because it's only used by such a minuscule portion of the English speaking people, and it takes words from the American English anyway, e.g. saying "Sedan" instead of the British "Saloon".
always have to "re-create" everything to American.[14] no argument, very annoying when you can only get your hands on the "US version" of something created elsewhere.
instead making their primary system of measurement "International System of Units", like the rest of the nations except for Myanmar, Liberia and the United States[13], they
use "United States Customary Units", just to be annoying.		 no argument, very annoying having to convert it.
are fat.
 no argument.
pollute a lot.
 no argument.


In conclusion, the only valid arguments are they:
But pretty much anything great on a global scale, was founded and developed in the USA, so personally the author has no "beef" with them.

^The "goodies" are actually the "baddies"
A while ago I came across a massive life plot twist, in an act of rebellion against Christianity I started reading about Satanism, and I realised which religion is better for society, which religion actually makes sense.

It turns out the the "goodies" are actually the "baddies".

Now I'm a proud Satanist, you can read about their beliefs on their site if you're interested.[2]

^T-shirt ideas
One of the following texts could be printed on a shirt, because I find them humorous:
^Linguistical

^The "i" word
Irregardless is a word stupid people use when trying to act intelligent. It's a prime example of the primary function of language; to determine if someone is an ample mate.
It's a blend of irrespective or irregarding with regardless, and a false word.
"Irregardless? That's not even a real word. You're affixing the negative prefix 'ir-' to 'regardless', but, as 'regardless' is already negative, it's a logical absurdity!" --(TV show) American Dad
That pretty much sums it up.
If there was a button on the wall that said "KILL ANYONE WHO USES THE WORD..." ok, no I'm not going to take it that far, but PLEASE could you just say regardless instead of irregardless if you don't do so already.


^The most flawed cliches and "sayings" of all time
A "saying" or cliche, is suppose to make sense both figuratively literally, so if it doesn't make sense literally, then it is flawed.

1. Nothing is impossible.
If you believe nothing is impossible, then you also must believe "it is impossible for something to be impossible" thus, something is impossible, so you can't say nothing is impossible.
FIX: "Anything is possible."

2. Never say never.
You just did.
FIX: "It's often unwise to say something cannot be done."

3. Never judge a book by its cover.
Why wouldn't you? The cover is made, specifically so you can judge the book by it. It has a relevant title, the author's name, and some info about the content of the book. If you see a half naked porn star on the cover of a magazine, then are you going to say, "oh, I don't judge a book by its cover, I'm still going to buy this magazine for my 5-yo daughter"?
FIX: "Never judge a book by the quality of its cover."

4. Treat others the way you would like to be treated.
"I'm a girl and I would like my boyfriend to buy me a pink car. Oh, I should treat him the way you would like to be treated, so I will buy him a pink car." According to the saying that would be a favourable course of action.
FIX: Respect the wises of others to the same extent that you would like your wishes to be respected.

//Don't worry, I'll find more.

^Character

^Music
Here's the response to anyone interested about my taste in music:

^P'
I might as well just tell you this, since this is just a glorified super secret dark diary after all, but I recently I came across the Wikipedia article on psychopathy.

I denied it at first, all P's deny it at first.

But every single thing on that page was true to describe me, even the obscure stuff in the talk page that wasn't verifiable enough to put in the article.

I like to call it being  a P', because I don't want all the people in my life to know this about me.

So now everything I say is going to be even less credible to the general population, it can just be dismissed as the "delusional
rantings of a psycho".

But who cares about them anyway.

^Quotes

^You (section)
What goes in this section?

^How to keep inconspicuous

^Strive for unhappiness theory
(Note: I was going to turn this into a book entitled The Guide to Unhappiness, but I thinks it's better just being free to all.)

Why would anyone strive for unhappiness?
Because whatever you try to do, nature will do the opposite.
If you go up gravity pulls you down, if you go down the earth pushes you up, we learn at an early age that in order to walk forward, you have to push your feet backward.
And at a later age, we might learn that in order to have a happy and fulfilling life your going to have to strive the other way, and hit bottom.
People of the older generations will probably find this idea stupid. For most of them, death and suffering were "right around the corner" while they were growing up. Very real, and enough to define their character and charisma, to give them something to rise up from and be proud of overcoming.
Now it's just a Hollywood movie.
The human race has a new obstacle never faced by any other animal.
In Australia we have suicide making up almost 30% of 20-to-35 year old male deaths [3]. Regular 20-to-35 year olds of this generation, hereby refered to as "Jacks", the generation without hardship or a 'great depression'. Jack's hardship is to feel alive, his great depression is the cavalcade of comfortable mediocrity which is his boring life. [4]
So I say, fuck the good life, you can take it and keep it, IN ORDER TO JUMP UP YOU GOTTA PUSH STRAIGHT FUCKING DOWN.[sam quote]

Why are you doing this?
The reason I'm writing this is to try and change the things people impose upon their lives and upon other people's lives, because I don't know if anybody in charge here has been paying attention, but just glancing at the next generation I can see some pretty FUCKED UP kids, they see that most of what is taught to them is no longer relatable, so they assume everything taught to them is useless, and anyone who can't relate to society is in a vulnerable position.

Any so-called guide to living a happy life will never work.
e.g. Just look at how much misery the Christian bible has bestowed upon the earth.
This is because you need to know what doesn’t work to fully understand what does, and if you suppress bad things the pressure to escape just increases (see R:HPHN).

^Examples of "backfired" strives for happiness
Strive 1:
Keep safe above all else, keep censored, and shielded, ignoring the dark side of humanity.
Get in a bomb shelter with your wife and children, and lock yourself away from the darkness in life.
Why it's shit:
40% of murders in Australia are commited by family or an intimate partner, [5] so you better get your own bomb shelter away from your family. But even then, I'll tell you another little secret, in 2007 in Australia you were 8 times more likely to be killed by yourself than anyone else [6], and rising.
By shielding yourself from the bad things in life you are turning the roller coaster of life into a boring straight-in-a-line-coaster, increasing the chance of killing a loved one and/or yourself, because it now takes so little to trigger the darkness you've been ignoring for so long.

Strive 2:
Blindly obey those who threaten you.
Why it's shit:
It's like negotiating with terrorists. Once you start negotiating with them they will just keep demanding, and demanding, and demanding, and demanding, and demanding, until they have manipulated you so much they control what you hear, see, feel, and even think.
I could go on and give examples of how corporations and the government choose everything we do, but we've all heard this before, and as much as I complain, I'm still a component of the system, Jack knows all this, but until now, it hasn't bothered Jack enough to spark a revolution.

Strive 3:
Have faith.
Let somebody with less experience dictate your life.
Why it's shit:

Strive 4:
Believe that the right and wrong things to do are NOT relative to an observer.
Believe that what you and/or the majority think are right and wrong must the only correct moral code.
Why it's shit:
Questioning the majority is how we evolve. See MSH.

Strive 5:
Don't listen to yourself.
If Glace tells you to eat chocolate, don't do it because some hominid thinks it's bad for you.
If Glace tells you to watch TV instead of homework, ignore him because he is bad.
If Glace tells you to go hunting instead of going to law school, he must be stupid because the TV tells me that I need to be rich and buy things to be happy.
Why it's shit:
Once you've ignored Glace to the point where he thinks he must not exist, BAM, he pulls a karoshi.

Strive 6:
Think about NOT thinking about something you don’t want to think about.
Then tell yourself aloud that you are NOT thinking about that thing, thinking it will drone out the fact that you are actually thinking about it.
Then trick yourself into believing that thinking about NOT thinking something actually counts as NOT thinking it.
Why it's shit:
When you ignore an important thought it only comes back stronger.

Strive 7:
Fail to realise that perfection is an asymptote.
And truly believe that some people are perfect and can give you total happiness.
Why it's shit:
When it appears to be what it approaches, you just have to look a little closer to see it's never perfect.
I believe this is the main cause of divorce, people think their spouse is perfect in every way, but then when the asymptote hits them BAM, they can't take the fact that they were not perfect.
If you just except it as an asymptote from the beginning, this will not happen.

Strive 8:
Believe that you're not just another animal on the earth.
That you're a beautiful and unique snowflake hand picked by God because he loves you so hugy-wugy much.
You can't be just a hominid with opposable thumbs, oh no, you're so much more civilised than that with your wars, rape, slavery and disregard for the rest of the animals.
Why it's shit:
It brainwashes regular people into ones who can do terrible things without feeling guilty for it.

Strive 9:
Believe somebody's effort is worth more than yours.
Spend hours lining up just to meet some celebrity for 5 seconds.
Spend countless hours packed in a gym so you can be more attractive to people.
Drive across town to buy some exotic roses for your girlfriend so she can know you're the bitch of the relationship.
Why it's shit:
This is sure way to piss off Glace.

^Little pieces of knowledge
 
^References
1. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_revolutions_and_rebellions, Counted on 2009-02
2. ^ http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html, official site
3. ^ http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/3309.0/, suicide stats in Australia
4. ^ kind of a paraphrased quote from the book/movie "fight club", most of the paragraph is in fact http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/,
5. ^ http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/77/ n=134 (336 total murderers) in 2006
6. ^ http://www.abs.gov.au/ n>2500 in 2007
7. ^ http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=3248, Just a few case studies by professionals to back it up, I'm sure there is better stuff out there, written 2006-10
8. ^ http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/03/why_michael_atkinsons_opposal_of_r18_does_bugger_all_to_protect_kids_promotes_crime.html, my attempt at a joke, funny because it is true, 2008-03
9. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy, is a policy, checked 2009-02. The "voting is evil" quote, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2007-05-28/BLP,_DRV,_ARB,_IRC, 3rd paragraph, 2007-05-28, I'm sure there is a better source for that but they have all been removed because of people's negative connotations when hearing that statement. There is also this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VIE, but it's now prefered as WP:PNSD; "Polling is not a substitute for discussion", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Polling_is_not_a_substitute_for_discussion, checked both on 2009-02.
10. ^ POV stands for "my own Point Of View" as in my own personal opinion.
11. ^ *I define intelligence as how close someone is to what I would like to be.
12. ^ Crystal, David (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-53032-6.
13. ^ The World Factbook. (2006). Washington: Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 2006-08-08 from Appendix G.
14. ^ E.g. "Prospect Of US 'Kath & Kim' Is Giving Us Horrible Nightmares In Advance" Defamer Australia (October 24, 2007)
15. ^ http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Clash_of_Civilizations_map.png
16. ^ Quote from a book by "Chuck Palahniuk", I'm like %90 sure it was in Haunted.
17. ^ IAR stands for "Ignore All Rules", if a rule prevents me from improving the page, it will be broken.

























You can reproduce whatever text you want from this site, with NO acknowledgement of the source, because I believe in R:OC (info can't be owned) and R:POV (the more people who read it the better). But it may be beneficial to point others towards me so they can learn more, if you mention something on this text.
If you reproduce the layout (the headings the anchors etc.), you do NOT have to give any acknowledgement either.
But I am kind of short on money right now, so if you make a whole bunch of money off something I've said I WILL FIND YOU.
;-)